Showing posts with label PON. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PON. Show all posts

Chinese PON equipment revenue to break $ 1 billion mark for Q2

IHS company reported that in 2015 Q2 worldwide broadband aggregation devices (DSL, PON, Ethernet and fiber to the home) revenues increased 12%, an increase of 11%. GPON growth largely from the rapid growth in China's shipments of drives, and high-speed DSL (VDSL) in.

"Service providers realize fixed broadband services highly profitable, so the level of investment to expand the speed and fixed broadband capabilities should remain stable and continue to focus on promoting the fiber to the access network. We have seen the expansion of FTTH in China, driven by the government to the country's policy China's EPON and GPON equipment continues to greatly enhance delivery record. "IHS researcher broadband access and pay TV Jeff Heynen representation.

GPON equipment market

More broadband market view:

Chinese market in 2015 Q2, PON equipment revenue hit a record-breaking first-quarter revenue estimate $ 1 billion.

2015 full-year expenses will be more operators tend to deploy FTTH.

North America 2015 Q2 consumption environment is very complex: GPON expenses
increased 1%, but the chain fell 10%; DSL expenses fell 18%, growth of 5%.

Due to the huge Chinese market, continued investment, IHS expects global broadband aggregation market will reach $ 9 billion in 2019.

ODN


ODN is an optical network based on PON equipment, mainly between OLT and ONU provide optical transmission channel. From the function points, ODN from the central office to the client can be divided into the feeder, wiring, home line subsystems and optical fiber cable terminal subsystem.

ODN network construction cost is relatively high, up to 50% to 70% of the total investment is FTTx investment focus. And also the difficulty of FTTx management. ODN use more P2MP topology, the network connecting nodes and more complex network management. Fiber sensitive than copper, more easily damaged. Therefore, ODN efficient construction, operation and maintenance of critical need an intelligent, accurate management solutions to ensure ODN network has been fully utilized, effective long-term investment protection.

As we see in the supermarket food and other commodities have the same bar code can be added in the fiber head tag of fiber for effective management, we call EODN; now this technology has become the major carriers and ITU-T, etc. standards organizations to discuss and focus.

Is it possible without changing the ODN passive features to address two core issues ODN managed to achieve ODN automated management?

iODN

Huawei proposed iODN (intelligent ODN) solutions. In iODN solution, ODN intelligence product adds the following features: Fiber identity management, port state collection, the port to find instructions, visualization tools PDA.

iODN solution enables automatic entry ODN fiber connection and management information to ensure accurate and timely information to synchronize inventory system. At the same time, through intelligent LED indication PDA visualization software and iODN device can achieve optical fiber Automation to Find, precise operation, which greatly improve the efficiency of operation and maintenance, ODN network to achieve efficient operation and maintenance. In addition, based on iODN architecture, based on the inventory system can develop a variety of value-added applications, to achieve the construction, operation and maintenance of the whole process automation.

eODN

ZTE launched the "eODN (Easy ODN)", GIS geographic information systems and R intelligent identification system based on. ODN network cycle of the system in all aspects of planning, design, construction and maintenance, the pre-planning, construction and ongoing maintenance mid-effective to combine the use of contactless smart fiber management systems to improve efficiency and achieve the various departments to share information and to optical fiber seamless transfer, let ODN network construction has become a dynamic virtuous circle, to ensure its sustainable development.

sODN

FiberHome adhere to the actual situation from the traditional starting ODN design products, we proposed "sODN (smart ODN)" complete solution.

System fully into account the existing traditional ODN operation and maintenance characteristics, and strive to ensure that existing employees can easily adapt to new intelligent ODN intelligent management mode implementation. System combines low power consumption, long life, easy to maintain, by means of the new information to make ODN network to become an organic whole, improve customer perception.

2016 China Telecom Solutions XG-PON1 interoperability

Currently, China Mobile added, broadband access market is highly competitive. China Telecom and China Unicom have copper resources are not willing to discard, so broadband network construction development should consider both asset protection. China Mobile is no copper "burden", and funded with strong competitiveness. Faced with the impact of China Mobile, China Telecom and China Unicom efforts to strengthen the construction of FTTH.

As the main force of China Telecom FTTH in the past few years, we have begun a gradual transition from the access technology G / EPON to 10G-EPON. Recent China Telecom's 2015 Central Purchasing PON equipment, including one million 10G EPON port, close to the G / EPON port level.

XG-PON is the next generation of GPON evolution of technology. Judgment based on practical needs and technology maturity, FSAN NG-PON evolution of the definition of planning is divided into two stages: XG-PON1 and NG-PON2. XG-PON1 medium-term evolution of PON, focusing on the study of both existing GPON ODN laying next generation standards.

10G EPON interoperability has been resolved, the current focus is to reduce equipment costs. XG-PON1 current focus is to promote interoperability, China Telecom will launch in the second half of 2015, 2016, respectively, and interoperability testing different vendors OLT ONU (SFU / HGU) devices, target solve interoperability in 2016, the scale of 2017 Commercial technical preparedness.

For China Telecom, XG-PON is insurmountable stage. Within three years, is expected to TWDM PON (NG-PON2) in standard equipment maturity, cost, interoperability and other aspects not yet reached the large-scale commercial level. China Telecom will organize XG-PON interoperability testing, as the Point XG-PON technology matures.

Calix NG PON2 platform launched in North America FTTH Assembly

Broadband access network equipment manufacturers Calix recently said it would increase the NG-PON2 TWDM function of its E7 Ethernet Service Access Platform series NG-PON2 4-way 10Gbps wavelength supports the gradual upgrade from the current GPON to 10G PON and WDM PON.

Calix indicates NG-PON2 technology supports both fixed and tunable wavelength in two models, and will be publicly displayed two models this fall. Market research firm Broadbandtrends representation of Teresa Mastrangelo , Calix fiber access in the field has a long history in this area have made many contributions. They launched the next generation of PON products not surprising. NG-PON2 will become the future of PON network standard. Calix has been ready for it.

Calix will showcase this product at FTTH Conference in North America this week.

What is the difference between GPON and EPON?

Currently, EPON and GPON are two major PON standards, one of which is the ITU / FSAN established Gigabit PON (GPON) standard, and the other is by the IEEE 802.3ah working group to develop the Ethernet PON (EPON) standard. ITU-T GPON is original to 155Mbit/s ATM technology-based APON (ATM PON) standard (APON) later renamed BPON (Broadband PON) development to the (G984.1, G984.2, G984.3). One thousand Katherine EPON known as GEPON. EPON and GPON are two standards, rather than EPON can be upgraded to GPON.

GPON vs EPON
GPON vs EPON

Rate

EPON to provide fixed-line and down 1.25Gbps, using 8b / 10b line coding, the actual rate of 1Gbps GPON supports multiple speed grades, can support asymmetric uplink and downlink rate, downstream 2.5Gbps or 1.25Gbps, 1.25Gbps upstream or 622 Mbps, the actual It needs to decide down the line speed, select the corresponding optical modules, optical devices to improve the rate of price ratio.

Split ratio

Tap the number of ONU (clients) than that is a port OLT (central office) with EPON standard defines the split ratio of 1:32. GPON standard defines the following types of 1:32 split ratio; one sixty-four; 1: 128 in fact, technically EPON system can do higher split ratios, such as 1: 64, 1: 128, EPON control protocol It can support more ONU. Split ratio is mainly confine light module performance by and large split ratio will result in a substantial increase in the cost of the optical module; in addition, PON insertion loss of 15~18dB, large branching ratio will reduce the transmission distance; too many users share Bandwidth is also a big shunt expense ratio.

The maximum transmission distance

GPON system can support a maximum physical distance, when the optical branching ratio is 1:16, it should support the maximum physical distance of 20km; when the optical branching ratio is 1:32, it should support the maximum physical distance of 10km.

EPON and GPON same.

QOS (Quality of Service)

EPON Ethernet header in the MAC layer adds 64 bytes of MPCP (multipoint control protocol), MPCP via messages, state machines and timers to control access to P2MP multipoint topology, dynamic bandwidth allocation DBA. Contents covered include ONU sends MPCP allocated slot, ONU automatic discovery and added to the congestion level of this report in order to dynamically allocate bandwidth. MPCP provides basic support for P2MP topologies, but the agreement was not on the priority business of the sorting process, all the business of competing random bandwidth.

GPON will have a more comprehensive DBA, with excellent QoS service capabilities. GPON service bandwidth allocation will be divided into four types, from high to low priority is fixed bandwidth (Fixed), guaranteed bandwidth (Assured), non-guaranteed bandwidth (Non-Assured) and best effort bandwidths (BestEffort). DBA and define the business container (traffic container, T-CONT) as the upstream traffic scheduling unit, each T-CONT by the Alloc-ID logo. Each T-CONT may contain one or more GEM Port-ID. T-CONT is divided into five kinds of business types, different types of T-CONT have different bandwidth allocation to meet the different traffic delay, jitter, Different QoS packet loss ratio requirements. Characteristics of T-CONT Type 1 is fixed bandwidth fixed timeslots fixed bandwidth (Fixed) allocation for delay-sensitive services such as voice services; characteristics of type 2 slot is a fixed bandwidth but uncertain, the corresponding guaranteed bandwidth (Assured) allocated for jitter less demanding fixed-bandwidth services such as video on demand service; type 3 is characterized by minimum guaranteed bandwidth and the ability to dynamically share surplus bandwidth and maximum bandwidth constraints, corresponding to a non-guaranteed bandwidth (Non -Assured) distribution, service assurance requirements adapted to have burst but the larger flow of business, such as downloading services; characteristics of Type 4 is the best effort (BestEffort), no bandwidth guarantee, suitable for less demanding latency and jitter services, such as WEB browsing service; Type 5 is a combination of the type of finish after the allocation guarantees and non-guaranteed bandwidth and best effort needs additional bandwidth allocated.

Operation, maintenance OAM

EPON OAM no undue consideration, simply defines a ONT remote fault indication, loopback and link monitoring. And is optionally supported.

GPON physical layer defines the PLOAM (Physical Layer OAM), high-level definition of the OMCI (ONT Management and Control Interface), performed at multiple levels OAM management. PLOAM for implementing data encryption, stateful inspection, error monitoring, and other functions. OMCI channel protocol used to manage high-level definition of business, including the ONU function parameter sets, T-CONT type and quantity of services, QoS parameters, request to run the event configuration information and performance statistics, automatic notification system to achieve OLT to ONT configuration, fault diagnostic, performance, and security management.

Link layer encapsulation and multi-service support

EPON Ethernet follows a simple data format, but in the Ethernet header adds 64 bytes of MPCP multipoint control protocol to achieve bandwidth allocation EPON system bandwidth polled, auto-discovery, ranging work. For data services other than services (such as TDM synchronization services) did not make too much research to support that many EPON manufacturers to develop a number of non-standard products to solve this problem, but not ideal, it is difficult to meet carrier-class QoS requirements.

GPON based entirely new transmission convergence (TC) layer, the sub-layer to complete the adaptation of senior business diversity that defines the ATM encapsulation and GFP encapsulation (Generic Framing Protocol), you can choose either to conduct business package. Given the current ATM application is not universal, so only support a GFP encapsulation GPON.lite equipment came into being, it is removed from the ATM protocol stack to reduce costs.

GFP is a universal link layer procedures applicable to a variety of business, ITU defined as G.7041.GPON GFP in a small number of modifications were made in the head GFP frame introduces Port ID, to support multi-port reuse; also introduced Frag (Fragment) segment of instructions to improve the effective bandwidth of the system and only support for variable length data, the data processing mode does not support block-oriented transparent data processing mode.

GPON has a powerful multi-service carrying capacity. GPON TC layer on nature are synchronized using a standard 8kHz (125μm) fixed length frames, which makes GPON can support end-timing and other quasi-synchronous traffic, in particular, can directly support TDM services, the so-called NativeTDM, GPON TDM services have "natural" support.

Epilogue

EPON and GPON is different, from the superior performance GPON EPON, but EPON has the advantage of time and cost, GPON is catching up, the future of broadband access market substitute who may not be who should be coexistence complementary. For bandwidth and multi-service, QoS and security requirements and high technology as the backbone of ATM customers, GPON will be more suitable. For cost-sensitive, QoS, security, less demanding customer base, EPON become dominant.

GPON maximum splitting ratio of 1: 128, EPON only 1:32;

Support GPON downlink bandwidth is not fixed, up to 2.5G / 1.25G, EPON supports only fixed upstream and downstream bandwidth of 1.25G / 1.25G;

Logic GPON transmission distance up to 60KM, EPON is 20KM.

But the actual effect is concerned, EPON and GPON less, the core part of almost all the same, GPON business a little more comprehensive support it, and now GPON EPON much less than the cost, mainly cost GPON optical modules is too high, Only after extensive use, etc. can drop too down.

PON history


PON research technology originated in 1995, in October 1998, ITU through the ATM-based PON technology standard --G.983 FSAN organization advocated, also known as BPON (BroadbandPON). Rate of 155Mbps, optional support 622Mbps speed.

EFMA (Ethernetin the First Mile Alliance) at the end of 2000 proposed Ethernet-PON (EPON) concept, transfer rate up to 1Gbps, based on simple Ethernet link layer encapsulation.

GPON (Gigabit-CapablePON) in September 2002 proposed by the FSAN Organization in March 2003 by the ITU G.984.1 and G.984.2 protocol. G.984.1 for GPON access system overall characteristics were prescribed; G.984.2 for GPON of ODN (Optical Distribution Network) Physical Media Dependent Sublayer been stipulated; in June 2004 passed the ITU G.984.3, it transmission Convergence (TC) layer requirements were specified.

Popular Posts